LinkedIn Visibility Boost: Women Discover Better Results When Pretending to be Men
Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?
Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.
The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach
Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.
Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.
Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised
The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.
Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.
Company Statement
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.
Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.
Individual Results
Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.
"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.
Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.
The Process
- First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
- Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
- Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style
The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.
The Downside
Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.
"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."
She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."
Mixed Results
Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.
"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.
Wider Consequences
These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.
Technical Explanation
According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.
Evolving Environment
As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."